Creation radioactive dating

Its results have been shown to be inconsistent, discordant, unreliable, and frequently bizarre in any model.

These two 'mutually-exclusive' facts convince one that something has been overlooked.

Assumption Two: No parent or daughter material has been added to or taken from the specimen.

This is particularly important in light of the Biblical flood.

How a rock is formed is important to understanding its isotopic make-up and any dates derived.

So if these are real dates then you can hold a rock in your hand that won't form for hundreds of thousands or even millions of years yet.

Now in all fairness Ar-Ar dating can get the right age for a sample of known age, but it can also date samples as way too old, but without a known date there is no way of knowing when it is too old.

However, as we look forward to a better alternative, it would behoove us to look back and restate the powerful tried and true arguments relating to the erroneous assumptions and contradictory results.

Assumption One: The radioisotope decay rates have been constant throughout the past.

Isotopic Fractionation is a physical separation of isotopes and a non-radioactive source of isotope ratios.

Tags: , ,